Competitor profile

MS JAI MATA DI CONSTRUCTION

They win 38% of what they bid, and 40% of the value they chase.

24tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
27 Nov 2026last award
Total bids
24
24 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
9
7 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹43.4 L
of ₹1.1 Cr bid — 39.7% conversion
Win rate
37.5%
of 24 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count24 bids
37.5%
33.3%
29.2%
Awarded937.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected833.3%
Lost729.2%
By value₹1.1 Cr
39.7%
14.9%
45.4%
Awarded₹43.4 L39.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹16.3 L14.9%
Lost₹49.6 L45.4%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
West Bengal₹43.4 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
BIKASH SUBBA7 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹14.7 L
won head-to-head
02
BIKASH LAMA0 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
HIMALAYAN CONSTRUCTION2 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹37.8 L
won head-to-head
04
KAMAKHYA CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
PRASHANT TAMANG0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
A. R. ENTERPRISE0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMS JAI MATA awardedOthers

About MS JAI MATA DI CONSTRUCTION

MS JAI MATA DI CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 24 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 24 decided bids, it was awarded 9 — a 37.5% win rate — worth ₹43.4 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 27 Nov 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is GORKHALAND TERRITORIAL ADMINISTRATION, at 76.0% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from West Bengal. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against BIKASH SUBBA, BIKASH LAMA and HIMALAYAN CONSTRUCTION. BIKASH SUBBA bid on 10 of the same tenders and won 7 of them; MS JAI MATA DI CONSTRUCTION won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.