Competitor profile

BIKASH LAMA

They win 6% of what they bid — and 54% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

18tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
27 Nov 2026last award
Total bids
18
18 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
17 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹89.4 L
of ₹1.7 Cr bid — 54.1% conversion
Win rate
5.6%
of 18 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count18 bids
94.4%
Awarded15.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost1794.4%
By value₹1.7 Cr
54.1%
45.9%
Awarded₹89.4 L54.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹75.8 L45.9%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

GORKHALAND TERRITORIAL ADMINISTRATION₹89.4 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
West Bengal₹89.4 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
BIKASH SUBBA13 wins · 16 shared tenders
₹30.0 L
won head-to-head
02
MS JAI MATA DI CONSTRUCTION1 win · 9 shared tenders
₹2.0 L
won head-to-head
03
KANCHANJANGHA CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
KAMAKHYA CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
DURGA NARAYAN PRADHAN0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
PARSHURAM SHARMA0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedBIKASH LAMA awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to BIKASH LAMA

About BIKASH LAMA

BIKASH LAMA appears as a bidder on 18 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 18 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 5.6% win rate — worth ₹89.4 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 27 Nov 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is GORKHALAND TERRITORIAL ADMINISTRATION, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from West Bengal. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against BIKASH SUBBA, MS JAI MATA DI CONSTRUCTION and KANCHANJANGHA CONSTRUCTION. BIKASH SUBBA bid on 16 of the same tenders and won 13 of them; BIKASH LAMA won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.