Competitor profile

KAMAKHYA CONSTRUCTION

They win 12% of what they bid — and 40% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

18tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
27 Nov 2026last award
Total bids
17
18 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
9 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹27.1 L
of ₹68.0 L bid — 39.9% conversion
Win rate
11.8%
of 17 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count17 bids
11.8%
35.3%
52.9%
Awarded211.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected635.3%
Lost952.9%
By value₹68.0 L
39.8%
14.8%
45.4%
Awarded₹27.1 L39.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹10.1 L14.8%
Lost₹30.8 L45.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
West Bengal₹27.1 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
BIKASH SUBBA6 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹10.0 L
won head-to-head
02
BIKASH LAMA0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
MS JAI MATA DI CONSTRUCTION1 win · 7 shared tenders
₹2.0 L
won head-to-head
04
AMIR LAMA5 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹20.6 L
won head-to-head
05
AJMS AND ASSOCIATES0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
AADITYA CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedKAMAKHYA CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

About KAMAKHYA CONSTRUCTION

KAMAKHYA CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 18 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 17 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 11.8% win rate — worth ₹27.1 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 27 Nov 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is GORKHALAND TERRITORIAL ADMINISTRATION, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from West Bengal. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against BIKASH SUBBA, BIKASH LAMA and MS JAI MATA DI CONSTRUCTION. BIKASH SUBBA bid on 7 of the same tenders and won 6 of them; KAMAKHYA CONSTRUCTION won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.