Competitor profile

BIKASH SUBBA

They win 59% of what they bid, and 59% of the value they chase.

29tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
27 Nov 2026last award
Total bids
29
29 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
17
12 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹69.9 L
of ₹1.2 Cr bid — 58.5% conversion
Win rate
58.6%
of 29 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count29 bids
58.6%
41.4%
Awarded1758.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost1241.4%
By value₹1.2 Cr
58.5%
41.5%
Awarded₹69.9 L58.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹49.5 L41.5%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
West Bengal₹69.9 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
BIKASH LAMA0 wins · 16 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
KANCHANJANGHA CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 15 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
MS JAI MATA DI CONSTRUCTION2 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹6.1 L
won head-to-head
04
KAMAKHYA CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
SANDEEP TAMANG4 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹5.1 L
won head-to-head
06
KESHAR CHETTRI0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedBIKASH SUBBA awardedOthers

About BIKASH SUBBA

BIKASH SUBBA appears as a bidder on 29 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 29 decided bids, it was awarded 17 — a 58.6% win rate — worth ₹69.9 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 27 Nov 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is GORKHALAND TERRITORIAL ADMINISTRATION, at 64.6% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from West Bengal. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against BIKASH LAMA, KANCHANJANGHA CONSTRUCTION and MS JAI MATA DI CONSTRUCTION. BIKASH LAMA bid on 16 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; BIKASH SUBBA won 13.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.