Competitor profile

ESCORTS KUBOTA LIMITED

They win 38% of what they bid — and 58% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

13tenders on record
7buyer authorities
6states
13 May 2026last award
Total bids
13
13 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
5 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.8 Cr
of ₹3.1 Cr bid — 57.6% conversion
Win rate
38.5%
of 13 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count13 bids
38.5%
23.1%
38.5%
Awarded538.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected323.1%
Lost538.5%
By value₹3.1 Cr
57.6%
15.7%
26.6%
Awarded₹1.8 Cr57.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹49.1 L15.7%
Lost₹83.1 L26.6%

Where they win

5 authorities · 4 states

Operating states

LowHigh
Punjab₹12.6 L
Haryana₹4.8 L
Assam₹0

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M. M. INTERNATIONAL2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹22.0 L
won head-to-head
02
M/S Goswami Tractors,2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹42.3 L
won head-to-head
03
VARDHMAN TRACTORS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
JAI GURUDEV INDUSTRIES1 win · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
₹0
won head-to-head
06
PM TRACTOR0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedESCORTS KUBOTA awardedOthers

About ESCORTS KUBOTA LIMITED

ESCORTS KUBOTA LIMITED appears as a bidder on 13 government tenders on record, from 7 buyer authorities in 6 states. Of its 13 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 38.5% win rate — worth ₹1.8 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 13 May 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Municipal Corporation of Delhi, at 86.3% of what it has won, out of 5 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Punjab, Himachal Pradesh and Haryana. On priced bids, its median quote is 3.7% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M. M. INTERNATIONAL, M/S Goswami Tractors, and VARDHMAN TRACTORS. M. M. INTERNATIONAL bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; ESCORTS KUBOTA LIMITED won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.