Competitor profile

M. M. INTERNATIONAL

They win 18% of what they bid, and 12% of the value they chase.

884tenders on record
7buyer authorities
1state
25 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
878
884 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
158
582 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹7.4 Cr
of ₹61.7 Cr bid — 12.0% conversion
Win rate
18.0%
of 878 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count878 bids
18.0%
15.7%
66.3%
Awarded15818.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected13815.7%
Lost58266.3%
By value₹61.7 Cr
12.0%
25.4%
62.6%
Awarded₹7.4 Cr12.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹15.7 Cr25.4%
Lost₹38.6 Cr62.6%

Where they win

4 authorities · 1 state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Kakar Alliances50 wins · 77 shared tenders
₹2.1 Cr
won head-to-head
02
JAI DURGA ELECTRICALS34 wins · 72 shared tenders
₹1.6 Cr
won head-to-head
03
Tanvi Enterprises28 wins · 57 shared tenders
₹1.2 Cr
won head-to-head
04
KAKAR FABRICATORS31 wins · 51 shared tenders
₹88.9 L
won head-to-head
05
YASHODHRA METALS9 wins · 44 shared tenders
₹69.2 L
won head-to-head
06
subhash and sons15 wins · 42 shared tenders
₹34.9 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedM. M. INTERNATIONAL awardedOthers

About M. M. INTERNATIONAL

M. M. INTERNATIONAL appears as a bidder on 884 government tenders on record, from 7 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 878 decided bids, it was awarded 158 — a 18.0% win rate — worth ₹7.4 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 25 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Department of Local Government, at 82.6% of what it has won, out of 4 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Punjab. On priced bids, its median quote is 14.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Kakar Alliances, JAI DURGA ELECTRICALS and Tanvi Enterprises. Kakar Alliances bid on 77 of the same tenders and won 50 of them; M. M. INTERNATIONAL won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.