Competitor profile

Vinod Kumar-Alfa Surgical Traders

They win 83% of what they bid, and 82% of the value they chase.

12tenders on record
6buyer authorities
1state
13 Jan 2015last award
Total bids
12
12 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
10
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.4 Cr
of ₹1.8 Cr bid — 81.6% conversion
Win rate
83.3%
of 12 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count12 bids
83.3%
Awarded1083.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected18.3%
Lost18.3%
By value₹1.8 Cr
81.6%
14.1%
Awarded₹1.4 Cr81.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹7.5 L4.2%
Lost₹25.0 L14.1%

Where they win

5 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Delhi₹1.4 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SUMIT KUMAR-SUMEET INTERNATIONAL6 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹1.0 Cr
won head-to-head
02
Richa Arora-Medicare Titan Instruments5 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹77.0 L
won head-to-head
03
SURESH SHARMA-HIND SURGICAL TRADERS3 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹27.5 L
won head-to-head
04
₹59.5 L
won head-to-head
05
R.K. Jindal3 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹45.0 L
won head-to-head
06
₹25.0 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedVinod Kumar-Alfa awardedOthers

About Vinod Kumar-Alfa Surgical Traders

Vinod Kumar-Alfa Surgical Traders appears as a bidder on 12 government tenders on record, from 6 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 12 decided bids, it was awarded 10 — a 83.3% win rate — worth ₹1.4 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 13 Jan 2015.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Babu Jagjivan Ram Memorial Hospital, at 34.6% of what it has won, out of 5 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Delhi. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against SUMIT KUMAR-SUMEET INTERNATIONAL, Richa Arora-Medicare Titan Instruments and SURESH SHARMA-HIND SURGICAL TRADERS. SUMIT KUMAR-SUMEET INTERNATIONAL bid on 7 of the same tenders and won 6 of them; Vinod Kumar-Alfa Surgical Traders won 6.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.