Competitor profile

SUMIT KUMAR-SUMEET INTERNATIONAL

They win 75% of what they bid, and 77% of the value they chase.

12tenders on record
5buyer authorities
1state
13 Jan 2015last award
Total bids
12
12 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
9
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.0 Cr
of ₹1.3 Cr bid — 77.4% conversion
Win rate
75.0%
of 12 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count12 bids
75.0%
25.0%
Awarded975.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost325.0%
By value₹1.3 Cr
77.4%
22.6%
Awarded₹1.0 Cr77.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹30.0 L22.6%

Where they win

4 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Delhi₹1.0 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Vinod Kumar-Alfa Surgical Traders6 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹1.0 Cr
won head-to-head
02
R.K. Jindal4 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹45.0 L
won head-to-head
03
B.N. Gupta-M/s Standard Traders3 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹20.0 L
won head-to-head
04
Richa Arora-Medicare Titan Instruments4 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹57.1 L
won head-to-head
05
₹25.0 L
won head-to-head
06
Sneh Rani-M/s Sneh Enterprises2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹20.0 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSUMIT KUMAR-SUMEET awardedOthers

About SUMIT KUMAR-SUMEET INTERNATIONAL

SUMIT KUMAR-SUMEET INTERNATIONAL appears as a bidder on 12 government tenders on record, from 5 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 12 decided bids, it was awarded 9 — a 75.0% win rate — worth ₹1.0 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 13 Jan 2015.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Attar Saini Jain Eye and General Hospital, Lawrenc, at 38.3% of what it has won, out of 4 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Delhi. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Vinod Kumar-Alfa Surgical Traders, R.K. Jindal and B.N. Gupta-M/s Standard Traders. Vinod Kumar-Alfa Surgical Traders bid on 7 of the same tenders and won 6 of them; SUMIT KUMAR-SUMEET INTERNATIONAL won 6.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.