Competitor profile

Richa Arora-Medicare Titan Instruments

They won all 6 of their bids with a result, worth ₹77.1 L.

6tenders on record
5buyer authorities
1state
9 May 2014last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
6
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹77.1 L
of ₹77.1 L bid — 100.0% conversion
Win rate
100.0%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count6 bids
100.0%
Awarded6100.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost00.0%
By value₹77.1 L
100.0%
Awarded₹77.1 L100.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

5 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Delhi₹77.1 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Vinod Kumar-Alfa Surgical Traders4 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹69.5 L
won head-to-head
02
SUMIT KUMAR-SUMEET INTERNATIONAL4 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹58.0 L
won head-to-head
03
₹59.5 L
won head-to-head
04
Rohit Grover -Rohit Surgical Pvt Ltd0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
SURESH SHARMA-HIND SURGICAL TRADERS2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹27.5 L
won head-to-head
06
₹47.0 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedRicha Arora-Medicare awardedOthers

About Richa Arora-Medicare Titan Instruments

Richa Arora-Medicare Titan Instruments appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 5 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 6 — a 100.0% win rate — worth ₹77.1 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 9 May 2014.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Attar Saini Jain Eye and General Hospital, Lawrenc, at 51.2% of what it has won, out of 5 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Delhi. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Vinod Kumar-Alfa Surgical Traders, SUMIT KUMAR-SUMEET INTERNATIONAL and Pradeep Kumar Sharma-Emcotech Equipments Pvt. Ltd.. Vinod Kumar-Alfa Surgical Traders bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; Richa Arora-Medicare Titan Instruments won 5.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.