Competitor profile

Sanjay Chadda

They win 50% of what they bid, but only 35% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

4tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
27 Apr 2013last award
Total bids
4
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹21.6 L
of ₹62.2 L bid — 34.8% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count4 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded250.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost250.0%
By value₹62.2 L
34.8%
65.2%
Awarded₹21.6 L34.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹40.5 L65.2%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

IPGCL-PPCL₹21.6 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Delhi₹21.6 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
HARDEEP -HARDEEP ENTERPRISES1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹14.7 L
won head-to-head
02
AMIT CHAUDHARY-PERFECT ENTERPRISES0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
krishan panchal-S.M.WORKS0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
VIJAY KUMAR-VIJAY KUMAR1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹21.8 L
won head-to-head
05
RAVI PRAKASH BANSAL-CURRENT SERVICES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSanjay Chadda awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to Sanjay Chadda

About Sanjay Chadda

Sanjay Chadda appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹21.6 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 27 Apr 2013.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is IPGCL-PPCL, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Delhi. On priced bids, its median quote is 4.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against HARDEEP -HARDEEP ENTERPRISES, AMIT CHAUDHARY-PERFECT ENTERPRISES and krishan panchal-S.M.WORKS. HARDEEP -HARDEEP ENTERPRISES bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; Sanjay Chadda won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.