Competitor profile

RAVI PRAKASH BANSAL-CURRENT SERVICES

They win 57% of what they bid, but only 31% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

7tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
27 Apr 2013last award
Total bids
7
7 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹26.1 L
of ₹84.9 L bid — 30.7% conversion
Win rate
57.1%
of 7 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count7 bids
57.1%
42.9%
Awarded457.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected342.9%
Lost00.0%
By value₹84.9 L
30.7%
69.3%
Awarded₹26.1 L30.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹58.9 L69.3%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

IPGCL-PPCL₹26.1 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Delhi₹26.1 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
AMIT CHAUDHARY-PERFECT ENTERPRISES0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Nisha Gupta-OM BUILDERS0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Vijay Singh2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹22.1 L
won head-to-head
04
SHRIPAL JAIN0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
HARDEEP -HARDEEP ENTERPRISES1 win · 1 shared tender
₹14.7 L
won head-to-head
06
Sanjay Chadda0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedRAVI PRAKASH awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to RAVI PRAKASH

About RAVI PRAKASH BANSAL-CURRENT SERVICES

RAVI PRAKASH BANSAL-CURRENT SERVICES appears as a bidder on 7 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 7 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 57.1% win rate — worth ₹26.1 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 27 Apr 2013.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is IPGCL-PPCL, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Delhi. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against AMIT CHAUDHARY-PERFECT ENTERPRISES, Nisha Gupta-OM BUILDERS and Vijay Singh. AMIT CHAUDHARY-PERFECT ENTERPRISES bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; RAVI PRAKASH BANSAL-CURRENT SERVICES won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.