Competitor profile

Rakesh kumar-Indian surgical systems

They won all 3 of their bids with a result, worth ₹35.0 L.

3tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
19 Oct 2013last award
Total bids
3
3 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹35.0 L
of ₹35.0 L bid — 100.0% conversion
Win rate
100.0%
of 3 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count3 bids
100.0%
Awarded3100.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost00.0%
By value₹35.0 L
100.0%
Awarded₹35.0 L100.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Delhi₹35.0 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Vinod Kumar-Alfa Surgical Traders3 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹35.0 L
won head-to-head
02
₹25.0 L
won head-to-head
03
SUMIT KUMAR-SUMEET INTERNATIONAL2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹25.0 L
won head-to-head
04
Sanjay Bhutani-Ortholine Meditech2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹25.0 L
won head-to-head
05
Raghav Sehgal-Chinar Surgical Co.1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹100
won head-to-head
06
Rishi Sahgal-PremierSurgicalCo1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹100
won head-to-head
Rival awardedRakesh kumar-Indian awardedOthers

About Rakesh kumar-Indian surgical systems

Rakesh kumar-Indian surgical systems appears as a bidder on 3 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 3 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 100.0% win rate — worth ₹35.0 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 19 Oct 2013.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Dr. Hedgewar Arogya Sansthan, at 71.4% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Delhi.

It most often bids against Vinod Kumar-Alfa Surgical Traders, Ravinder Kumar Ahuja-Ahujasons Surgicals and SUMIT KUMAR-SUMEET INTERNATIONAL. Vinod Kumar-Alfa Surgical Traders bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; Rakesh kumar-Indian surgical systems won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.