Competitor profile

M/S PANKAJ KUMAR

They win 44% of what they bid, and 46% of the value they chase.

63tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
14 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
63
63 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
28
30 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.3 Cr
of ₹2.8 Cr bid — 45.5% conversion
Win rate
44.4%
of 63 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count63 bids
44.4%
47.6%
Awarded2844.4%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected57.9%
Lost3047.6%
By value₹2.8 Cr
45.5%
10.2%
44.3%
Awarded₹1.3 Cr45.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹28.8 L10.2%
Lost₹1.2 Cr44.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Chandigarh₹1.3 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
MS PRITPAL ENTERPRISES4 wins · 35 shared tenders
₹14.8 L
won head-to-head
02
MS R.R.BUILDERS2 wins · 26 shared tenders
₹5.5 L
won head-to-head
03
M/S KITE ELEVATORS2 wins · 19 shared tenders
₹7.6 L
won head-to-head
04
Shiv Mohan Singh Constructions4 wins · 18 shared tenders
₹18.9 L
won head-to-head
05
MOHIT CONSTRUCTIONS1 win · 15 shared tenders
₹1.9 L
won head-to-head
06
BABLU KUMAR0 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedPANKAJ KUMAR awardedOthers

About M/S PANKAJ KUMAR

M/S PANKAJ KUMAR appears as a bidder on 63 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 63 decided bids, it was awarded 28 — a 44.4% win rate — worth ₹1.3 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 14 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Chandigarh Administration, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Chandigarh. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against MS PRITPAL ENTERPRISES, MS R.R.BUILDERS and M/S KITE ELEVATORS. MS PRITPAL ENTERPRISES bid on 35 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; M/S PANKAJ KUMAR won 19.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.