Competitor profile

M/S KITE ELEVATORS

They win 24% of what they bid, and 17% of the value they chase.

897tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
30 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
895
897 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
218
659 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹4.9 Cr
of ₹28.4 Cr bid — 17.2% conversion
Win rate
24.4%
of 895 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count895 bids
24.4%
73.6%
Awarded21824.4%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected182.0%
Lost65973.6%
By value₹28.4 Cr
17.2%
79.9%
Awarded₹4.9 Cr17.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹84.2 L3.0%
Lost₹22.7 Cr79.9%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Chandigarh₹4.9 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
MS PRITPAL ENTERPRISES96 wins · 435 shared tenders
₹2.8 Cr
won head-to-head
02
MS R.R.BUILDERS85 wins · 372 shared tenders
₹2.5 Cr
won head-to-head
03
Shiv Mohan Singh Constructions86 wins · 239 shared tenders
₹3.6 Cr
won head-to-head
04
MOHIT CONSTRUCTIONS48 wins · 213 shared tenders
₹1.4 Cr
won head-to-head
05
LADI ENTERPRISES48 wins · 150 shared tenders
₹88.7 L
won head-to-head
06
SURYA ENTERPRISES28 wins · 127 shared tenders
₹75.2 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedKITE ELEVATORS awardedOthers

About M/S KITE ELEVATORS

M/S KITE ELEVATORS appears as a bidder on 897 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 895 decided bids, it was awarded 218 — a 24.4% win rate — worth ₹4.9 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 30 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Chandigarh Administration, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Chandigarh. On priced bids, its median quote is 4.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against MS PRITPAL ENTERPRISES, MS R.R.BUILDERS and Shiv Mohan Singh Constructions. MS PRITPAL ENTERPRISES bid on 435 of the same tenders and won 96 of them; M/S KITE ELEVATORS won 81.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.