Competitor profile

MS R.R.BUILDERS

They win 31% of what they bid, and 29% of the value they chase.

1,558tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
30 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
1,546
1,558 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
477
1,055 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹43.4 Cr
of ₹150.6 Cr bid — 28.8% conversion
Win rate
30.9%
of 1,546 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count1,546 bids
30.9%
68.2%
Awarded47730.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected140.9%
Lost1,05568.2%
By value₹150.6 Cr
28.8%
68.9%
Awarded₹43.4 Cr28.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹3.4 Cr2.3%
Lost₹103.7 Cr68.9%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Municipal Corporation₹4.8 Cr11.2%

Operating states

LowHigh
Chandigarh₹43.4 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
MS PRITPAL ENTERPRISES85 wins · 418 shared tenders
₹3.2 Cr
won head-to-head
02
M/S KITE ELEVATORS78 wins · 372 shared tenders
₹1.6 Cr
won head-to-head
03
MOHIT CONSTRUCTIONS56 wins · 270 shared tenders
₹2.5 Cr
won head-to-head
04
Shiv Mohan Singh Constructions70 wins · 248 shared tenders
₹2.3 Cr
won head-to-head
05
SURYA ENTERPRISES25 wins · 177 shared tenders
₹1.5 Cr
won head-to-head
06
VENUS ELECTRICALS25 wins · 115 shared tenders
₹86.0 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMS R.R.BUILDERS awardedOthers

About MS R.R.BUILDERS

MS R.R.BUILDERS appears as a bidder on 1,558 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 1,546 decided bids, it was awarded 477 — a 30.9% win rate — worth ₹43.4 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 30 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Chandigarh Administration, at 88.8% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Chandigarh. On priced bids, its median quote is 4.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against MS PRITPAL ENTERPRISES, M/S KITE ELEVATORS and MOHIT CONSTRUCTIONS. MS PRITPAL ENTERPRISES bid on 418 of the same tenders and won 85 of them; MS R.R.BUILDERS won 87.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.