Competitor profile

Shiv Mohan Singh Constructions

They win 33% of what they bid, and 29% of the value they chase.

515tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
25 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
513
515 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
169
335 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹7.3 Cr
of ₹25.2 Cr bid — 28.9% conversion
Win rate
32.9%
of 513 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count513 bids
32.9%
65.3%
Awarded16932.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected91.8%
Lost33565.3%
By value₹25.2 Cr
28.9%
67.4%
Awarded₹7.3 Cr28.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹91.8 L3.6%
Lost₹17.0 Cr67.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Chandigarh₹7.3 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
MS PRITPAL ENTERPRISES46 wins · 265 shared tenders
₹1.7 Cr
won head-to-head
02
MS R.R.BUILDERS64 wins · 248 shared tenders
₹3.0 Cr
won head-to-head
03
M/S KITE ELEVATORS39 wins · 239 shared tenders
₹1.2 Cr
won head-to-head
04
MOHIT CONSTRUCTIONS26 wins · 152 shared tenders
₹1.4 Cr
won head-to-head
05
SURYA ENTERPRISES10 wins · 79 shared tenders
₹78.7 L
won head-to-head
06
LADI ENTERPRISES20 wins · 61 shared tenders
₹59.3 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedShiv Mohan awardedOthers

About Shiv Mohan Singh Constructions

Shiv Mohan Singh Constructions appears as a bidder on 515 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 513 decided bids, it was awarded 169 — a 32.9% win rate — worth ₹7.3 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 25 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Chandigarh Administration, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Chandigarh. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.9% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against MS PRITPAL ENTERPRISES, MS R.R.BUILDERS and M/S KITE ELEVATORS. MS PRITPAL ENTERPRISES bid on 265 of the same tenders and won 46 of them; Shiv Mohan Singh Constructions won 87.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.