Competitor profile

Navin Kumar Gupta

They win 6% of what they bid, and 14% of the value they chase.

16tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
3 Jul 2023last award
Total bids
16
16 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
14 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹84.0 L
of ₹6.1 Cr bid — 13.9% conversion
Win rate
6.3%
of 16 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count16 bids
87.5%
Awarded16.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected16.3%
Lost1487.5%
By value₹6.1 Cr
13.9%
10.6%
75.5%
Awarded₹84.0 L13.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹64.3 L10.6%
Lost₹4.6 Cr75.5%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Delhi₹84.0 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Abhikalp Constructions Syndicate0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Afjal Construction2 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹51.7 L
won head-to-head
03
Sabur Alam1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹85.6 L
won head-to-head
04
SHRI DATTA KRUPA ENTERPRISES1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹71.1 L
won head-to-head
05
M/S Bhawani Constructions0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
BRAHAM SINGH0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNavin Kumar awardedOthers

About Navin Kumar Gupta

Navin Kumar Gupta appears as a bidder on 16 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 16 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 6.3% win rate — worth ₹84.0 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 3 Jul 2023.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Public Works Department, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Delhi. On priced bids, its median quote is 41.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Abhikalp Constructions Syndicate, Afjal Construction and Sabur Alam. Abhikalp Constructions Syndicate bid on 6 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; Navin Kumar Gupta won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.