Competitor profile

Afjal Construction

They win 30% of what they bid, and 28% of the value they chase.

20tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
17 Jul 2023last award
Total bids
20
20 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
6
13 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹68.7 L
of ₹2.4 Cr bid — 28.2% conversion
Win rate
30.0%
of 20 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count20 bids
30.0%
65.0%
Awarded630.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected15.0%
Lost1365.0%
By value₹2.4 Cr
28.2%
69.3%
Awarded₹68.7 L28.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹6.1 L2.5%
Lost₹1.7 Cr69.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Delhi₹68.7 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SHRI DATTA KRUPA ENTERPRISES1 win · 8 shared tenders
₹7.1 L
won head-to-head
02
Abhikalp Constructions Syndicate0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Mohd Arshad1 win · 6 shared tenders
₹1.5 L
won head-to-head
04
S K Builders1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹5.0 L
won head-to-head
05
Rahul Construction Co.0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
BRAHAM SINGH1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹4.6 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAfjal Construction awardedOthers

About Afjal Construction

Afjal Construction appears as a bidder on 20 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 20 decided bids, it was awarded 6 — a 30.0% win rate — worth ₹68.7 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 17 Jul 2023.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Public Works Department, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Delhi. On priced bids, its median quote is 4.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SHRI DATTA KRUPA ENTERPRISES, Abhikalp Constructions Syndicate and Mohd Arshad. SHRI DATTA KRUPA ENTERPRISES bid on 8 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; Afjal Construction won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.