Competitor profile

MSA Instruments

They win 38% of what they bid, and 28% of the value they chase.

86tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
1 Jan 2025last award
Total bids
86
86 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
33
31 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹4.0 Cr
of ₹14.1 Cr bid — 28.5% conversion
Win rate
38.4%
of 86 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count86 bids
38.4%
25.6%
36.0%
Awarded3338.4%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected2225.6%
Lost3136.0%
By value₹14.1 Cr
28.5%
25.0%
46.5%
Awarded₹4.0 Cr28.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹3.5 Cr25.0%
Lost₹6.6 Cr46.5%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

IndianOil₹4.0 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

33 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
RESPO PRODUCTS7 wins · 23 shared tenders
₹2.1 Cr
won head-to-head
02
YOKOGAWA INDIA LTD.11 wins · 19 shared tenders
₹86.3 L
won head-to-head
03
Emerson Process Management India Pvt Ltd7 wins · 16 shared tenders
₹61.9 L
won head-to-head
04
₹39.6 L
won head-to-head
05
Sage Associates5 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹25.3 L
won head-to-head
06
Detection Instruments India Pvt ltd3 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹1.1 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMSA Instruments awardedOthers

About MSA Instruments

MSA Instruments appears as a bidder on 86 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 86 decided bids, it was awarded 33 — a 38.4% win rate — worth ₹4.0 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Jan 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is IndianOil, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 10.7% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against RESPO PRODUCTS, YOKOGAWA INDIA LTD. and Emerson Process Management India Pvt Ltd. RESPO PRODUCTS bid on 23 of the same tenders and won 7 of them; MSA Instruments won 11.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.