Competitor profile

M.J.Enterprises

They win 50% of what they bid, but only 39% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

24tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
30 Oct 2025last award
Total bids
24
24 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
12
9 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹71.7 L
of ₹1.8 Cr bid — 39.1% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 24 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count24 bids
50.0%
12.5%
37.5%
Awarded1250.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected312.5%
Lost937.5%
By value₹1.8 Cr
39.1%
22.6%
38.3%
Awarded₹71.7 L39.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹41.5 L22.6%
Lost₹70.2 L38.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Punjab₹71.7 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Kakar Alliances5 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹18.5 L
won head-to-head
02
M. M. INTERNATIONAL0 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Kakar Associates4 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹23.8 L
won head-to-head
04
OMEGA MACHINES TOOLS CORPORATION0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
₹0
won head-to-head
06
avtarsingh0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedM.J.Enterprises awardedOthers

About M.J.Enterprises

M.J.Enterprises appears as a bidder on 24 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 24 decided bids, it was awarded 12 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹71.7 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 30 Oct 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Department of Local Government, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Punjab. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Kakar Alliances, M. M. INTERNATIONAL and Kakar Associates. Kakar Alliances bid on 11 of the same tenders and won 5 of them; M.J.Enterprises won 5.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.