Competitor profile

Kakar Associates

They win 70% of what they bid, and 72% of the value they chase.

122tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
12 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
120
122 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
84
33 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹12.4 Cr
of ₹17.2 Cr bid — 72.2% conversion
Win rate
70.0%
of 120 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count120 bids
70.0%
27.5%
Awarded8470.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected32.5%
Lost3327.5%
By value₹17.2 Cr
72.2%
25.0%
Awarded₹12.4 Cr72.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹48.1 L2.8%
Lost₹4.3 Cr25.0%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Punjab₹12.4 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M. M. INTERNATIONAL1 win · 38 shared tenders
₹4.5 L
won head-to-head
02
V. P. ENTERPRISES2 wins · 33 shared tenders
₹20.5 L
won head-to-head
03
KAKAR FABRICATORS10 wins · 20 shared tenders
₹60.1 L
won head-to-head
04
TECHNIC FABRICATIONS PVT LTD3 wins · 14 shared tenders
₹78.0 L
won head-to-head
05
DHIMAN AGRO WORKSHOP1 win · 8 shared tenders
₹2.8 L
won head-to-head
06
M.J.Enterprises2 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹13.8 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedKakar Associates awardedOthers

About Kakar Associates

Kakar Associates appears as a bidder on 122 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 120 decided bids, it was awarded 84 — a 70.0% win rate — worth ₹12.4 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 12 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Department of Local Government, at 97.2% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Punjab. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against M. M. INTERNATIONAL, V. P. ENTERPRISES and KAKAR FABRICATORS. M. M. INTERNATIONAL bid on 38 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; Kakar Associates won 29.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.