Competitor profile

M/S HARSON ENTERPRISES

They win 3% of what they bid, and 0.2% of the value they chase.

40tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
29 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
39
40 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
37 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.8 L
of ₹12.8 Cr bid — 0.2% conversion
Win rate
2.6%
of 39 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count39 bids
94.9%
Awarded12.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected12.6%
Lost3794.9%
By value₹12.8 Cr
92.9%
Awarded₹2.8 L0.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹87.7 L6.8%
Lost₹11.9 Cr92.9%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S INDAN FURNITURE MART9 wins · 18 shared tenders
₹1.7 Cr
won head-to-head
02
VEE KAY IND0 wins · 16 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
M/S Ajay Saini5 wins · 13 shared tenders
₹73.0 L
won head-to-head
04
sharma trader2 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹89.5 L
won head-to-head
05
PUSHPAK INDUSTRIES5 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹83.0 L
won head-to-head
06
M.B TUBE AND ALLIED IND. Contr4 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹76.4 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedHARSON ENTERPRISES awardedOthers

About M/S HARSON ENTERPRISES

M/S HARSON ENTERPRISES appears as a bidder on 40 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 39 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 2.6% win rate — worth ₹2.8 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 29 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 61.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S INDAN FURNITURE MART, VEE KAY IND and M/S Ajay Saini. M/S INDAN FURNITURE MART bid on 18 of the same tenders and won 9 of them; M/S HARSON ENTERPRISES won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.