Competitor profile

PUSHPAK INDUSTRIES

They win 42% of what they bid, but only 29% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

82tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
17 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
77
82 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
32
43 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹5.7 Cr
of ₹19.5 Cr bid — 29.4% conversion
Win rate
41.6%
of 77 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count77 bids
41.6%
55.8%
Awarded3241.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected22.6%
Lost4355.8%
By value₹19.5 Cr
29.4%
69.1%
Awarded₹5.7 Cr29.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹28.0 L1.4%
Lost₹13.5 Cr69.1%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

32 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
VEE KAY IND8 wins · 50 shared tenders
₹1.8 Cr
won head-to-head
02
sharma trader4 wins · 31 shared tenders
₹1.2 Cr
won head-to-head
03
M/S INDAN FURNITURE MART8 wins · 22 shared tenders
₹2.4 Cr
won head-to-head
04
PACHNANDA BUILDERS6 wins · 20 shared tenders
₹1.3 Cr
won head-to-head
05
M/S Ajay Saini6 wins · 15 shared tenders
₹71.3 L
won head-to-head
06
ASHOKA FURNITURES0 wins · 13 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedPUSHPAK INDUSTRIES awardedOthers

About PUSHPAK INDUSTRIES

PUSHPAK INDUSTRIES appears as a bidder on 82 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 77 decided bids, it was awarded 32 — a 41.6% win rate — worth ₹5.7 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 17 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against VEE KAY IND, sharma trader and M/S INDAN FURNITURE MART. VEE KAY IND bid on 50 of the same tenders and won 8 of them; PUSHPAK INDUSTRIES won 16.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.