Competitor profile

M/S INDAN FURNITURE MART

They win 38% of what they bid, and 34% of the value they chase.

148tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
30 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
138
148 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
52
81 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹14.0 Cr
of ₹41.8 Cr bid — 33.5% conversion
Win rate
37.7%
of 138 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count138 bids
37.7%
58.7%
Awarded5237.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected53.6%
Lost8158.7%
By value₹41.8 Cr
33.5%
60.6%
Awarded₹14.0 Cr33.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.5 Cr5.9%
Lost₹25.3 Cr60.6%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

52 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/s Rajesh Kumar Jain1 win · 36 shared tenders
₹9.3 L
won head-to-head
02
M/S Ajay Saini14 wins · 34 shared tenders
₹2.2 Cr
won head-to-head
03
Daya Nand Jindal7 wins · 32 shared tenders
₹94.7 L
won head-to-head
04
VEE KAY IND2 wins · 31 shared tenders
₹39.7 L
won head-to-head
05
G S Builders8 wins · 29 shared tenders
₹1.9 Cr
won head-to-head
06
M.B TUBE AND ALLIED IND. Contr7 wins · 24 shared tenders
₹1.0 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedINDAN FURNITURE awardedOthers

About M/S INDAN FURNITURE MART

M/S INDAN FURNITURE MART appears as a bidder on 148 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 138 decided bids, it was awarded 52 — a 37.7% win rate — worth ₹14.0 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 30 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 7.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/s Rajesh Kumar Jain, M/S Ajay Saini and Daya Nand Jindal. M/s Rajesh Kumar Jain bid on 36 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; M/S INDAN FURNITURE MART won 16.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.