Competitor profile

Daya Nand Jindal

They win 49% of what they bid, and 40% of the value they chase.

99tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
3 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
92
99 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
45
47 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹6.6 Cr
of ₹16.8 Cr bid — 39.6% conversion
Win rate
48.9%
of 92 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count92 bids
48.9%
51.1%
Awarded4548.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost4751.1%
By value₹16.8 Cr
39.6%
60.4%
Awarded₹6.6 Cr39.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹10.1 Cr60.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

45 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/s Rajesh Kumar Jain1 win · 34 shared tenders
₹3.2 L
won head-to-head
02
M/S INDAN FURNITURE MART12 wins · 32 shared tenders
₹2.1 Cr
won head-to-head
03
M/s Pee Jay Enterprises11 wins · 24 shared tenders
₹2.2 Cr
won head-to-head
04
B K CONTRACTORS0 wins · 17 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
ASHOKA FURNITURES0 wins · 16 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/s R.K.Jain0 wins · 14 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedDaya Nand Jindal awardedOthers

About Daya Nand Jindal

Daya Nand Jindal appears as a bidder on 99 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 92 decided bids, it was awarded 45 — a 48.9% win rate — worth ₹6.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 3 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/s Rajesh Kumar Jain, M/S INDAN FURNITURE MART and M/s Pee Jay Enterprises. M/s Rajesh Kumar Jain bid on 34 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; Daya Nand Jindal won 16.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.