Competitor profile

M.B TUBE AND ALLIED IND. Contr

They win 20% of what they bid, and 15% of the value they chase.

51tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
1 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
49
51 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
10
31 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.8 Cr
of ₹11.5 Cr bid — 15.4% conversion
Win rate
20.4%
of 49 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count49 bids
20.4%
16.3%
63.3%
Awarded1020.4%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected816.3%
Lost3163.3%
By value₹11.5 Cr
15.4%
15.2%
69.4%
Awarded₹1.8 Cr15.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.7 Cr15.2%
Lost₹8.0 Cr69.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

10 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S INDAN FURNITURE MART13 wins · 24 shared tenders
₹2.1 Cr
won head-to-head
02
VEE KAY IND1 win · 12 shared tenders
₹17.4 L
won head-to-head
03
M/s Rajesh Kumar Jain1 win · 11 shared tenders
₹9.3 L
won head-to-head
04
M/S Ajay Saini4 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹74.7 L
won head-to-head
05
sharma trader1 win · 7 shared tenders
₹2.4 L
won head-to-head
06
M/S HARSON ENTERPRISES0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedM.B TUBE AND awardedOthers

About M.B TUBE AND ALLIED IND. Contr

M.B TUBE AND ALLIED IND. Contr appears as a bidder on 51 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 49 decided bids, it was awarded 10 — a 20.4% win rate — worth ₹1.8 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 12.9% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S INDAN FURNITURE MART, VEE KAY IND and M/s Rajesh Kumar Jain. M/S INDAN FURNITURE MART bid on 24 of the same tenders and won 13 of them; M.B TUBE AND ALLIED IND. Contr won 7.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.