Competitor profile

Vedant Arvind Mardane

They win 25% of what they bid, and 16% of the value they chase.

16tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
18 Dec 2025last award
Total bids
16
16 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
12 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹14.3 L
of ₹91.2 L bid — 15.7% conversion
Win rate
25.0%
of 16 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count16 bids
25.0%
75.0%
Awarded425.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost1275.0%
By value₹91.2 L
15.6%
84.4%
Awarded₹14.3 L15.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹76.9 L84.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹14.3 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
NILESH NINA SONAWANE0 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
SHREE SAI UDYOG3 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹15.5 L
won head-to-head
03
SUREKHA CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/s. Akash Vitthal Bhore0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Shree Swami Samarth Enterprises0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
BALAJI JANARDHAN BIRADAR0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedVedant Arvind awardedOthers

About Vedant Arvind Mardane

Vedant Arvind Mardane appears as a bidder on 16 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 16 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 25.0% win rate — worth ₹14.3 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 18 Dec 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Pune Municipal Corporation, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 11.9% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against NILESH NINA SONAWANE, SHREE SAI UDYOG and SUREKHA CONSTRUCTION. NILESH NINA SONAWANE bid on 10 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; Vedant Arvind Mardane won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.