Competitor profile

NILESH NINA SONAWANE

They win 24% of what they bid, but only 8% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

21tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
13 Nov 2025last award
Total bids
21
21 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
13 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹11.7 L
of ₹1.5 Cr bid — 8.0% conversion
Win rate
23.8%
of 21 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count21 bids
23.8%
14.3%
61.9%
Awarded523.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected314.3%
Lost1361.9%
By value₹1.5 Cr
37.2%
54.9%
Awarded₹11.7 L8.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹54.5 L37.2%
Lost₹80.4 L54.9%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹11.7 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SHREE SAI UDYOG4 wins · 14 shared tenders
₹18.9 L
won head-to-head
02
Vedant Arvind Mardane0 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
ANU CONSTRUCTION6 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹28.1 L
won head-to-head
04
SHRI BALAJI CONTRACTORS AND DEVELOPERS0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
AYUSH CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
KHARMATE SATYAM PRAKASH0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNILESH NINA awardedOthers

About NILESH NINA SONAWANE

NILESH NINA SONAWANE appears as a bidder on 21 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 21 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 23.8% win rate — worth ₹11.7 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 13 Nov 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Pune Municipal Corporation, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 11.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SHREE SAI UDYOG, Vedant Arvind Mardane and ANU CONSTRUCTION. SHREE SAI UDYOG bid on 14 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; NILESH NINA SONAWANE won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.