Competitor profile

Umesh Kumar Saw

They win 22% of what they bid, and 19% of the value they chase.

32tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
17 Jul 2025last award
Total bids
32
32 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
7
24 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.0 Cr
of ₹10.9 Cr bid — 18.5% conversion
Win rate
21.9%
of 32 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count32 bids
21.9%
75.0%
Awarded721.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected13.1%
Lost2475.0%
By value₹10.9 Cr
18.5%
14.1%
67.4%
Awarded₹2.0 Cr18.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.5 Cr14.1%
Lost₹7.3 Cr67.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

NTPC Limited₹2.0 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

7 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
MAA LAKSHMI ENTERPRISES7 wins · 18 shared tenders
₹2.5 Cr
won head-to-head
02
Chand Collection1 win · 13 shared tenders
₹62.8 L
won head-to-head
03
SHIVA CONSTRUCTION4 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹70.4 L
won head-to-head
04
MANOJ KUMAR SAW1 win · 10 shared tenders
₹12.8 L
won head-to-head
05
joy developments1 win · 9 shared tenders
₹1.5 Cr
won head-to-head
06
MD.FIROZ ALAM0 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedUmesh Kumar awardedOthers

About Umesh Kumar Saw

Umesh Kumar Saw appears as a bidder on 32 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 32 decided bids, it was awarded 7 — a 21.9% win rate — worth ₹2.0 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 17 Jul 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is NTPC Limited, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 10.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against MAA LAKSHMI ENTERPRISES, Chand Collection and SHIVA CONSTRUCTION. MAA LAKSHMI ENTERPRISES bid on 18 of the same tenders and won 7 of them; Umesh Kumar Saw won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.