Competitor profile

joy developments

They win 28% of what they bid, and 30% of the value they chase.

61tenders on record
2buyer authorities
0states
7 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
61
61 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
17
44 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹9.4 Cr
of ₹31.5 Cr bid — 29.9% conversion
Win rate
27.9%
of 61 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count61 bids
27.9%
72.1%
Awarded1727.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost4472.1%
By value₹31.5 Cr
29.9%
70.1%
Awarded₹9.4 Cr29.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹22.1 Cr70.1%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

NTPC Limited₹9.4 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

17 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Chand Collection2 wins · 25 shared tenders
₹1.4 Cr
won head-to-head
02
MAA LAKSHMI ENTERPRISES2 wins · 17 shared tenders
₹1.3 Cr
won head-to-head
03
M/S FAROOQUI ENTERPRISES1 win · 14 shared tenders
₹83.3 L
won head-to-head
04
MAA GITANJALI CONSTRUCTION3 wins · 14 shared tenders
₹98.4 L
won head-to-head
05
M/S Ajay Kumar5 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹1.4 Cr
won head-to-head
06
MATA JANKI CONCRETE PRIVATE LIMITED2 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹1.8 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedjoy developments awardedOthers

About joy developments

joy developments appears as a bidder on 61 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 61 decided bids, it was awarded 17 — a 27.9% win rate — worth ₹9.4 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 7 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is NTPC Limited, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 5.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Chand Collection, MAA LAKSHMI ENTERPRISES and M/S FAROOQUI ENTERPRISES. Chand Collection bid on 25 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; joy developments won 5.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.