Competitor profile

MANOJ KUMAR SAW

They win 28% of what they bid — and 39% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

58tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
4 May 2026last award
Total bids
57
58 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
16
40 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹8.6 Cr
of ₹21.8 Cr bid — 39.4% conversion
Win rate
28.1%
of 57 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count57 bids
28.1%
70.2%
Awarded1628.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected11.8%
Lost4070.2%
By value₹21.8 Cr
39.4%
58.0%
Awarded₹8.6 Cr39.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹58.3 L2.7%
Lost₹12.6 Cr58.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

NTPC Limited₹8.6 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

16 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Chand Collection3 wins · 32 shared tenders
₹1.4 Cr
won head-to-head
02
MAA LAKSHMI ENTERPRISES4 wins · 18 shared tenders
₹2.8 Cr
won head-to-head
03
RIGHT WAY COMMERCE PRIVATE LIMITED1 win · 16 shared tenders
₹30.0 L
won head-to-head
04
Amrit saw3 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹17.9 L
won head-to-head
05
₹87.7 L
won head-to-head
06
M/S ARVIND AND SONS2 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹2.3 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMANOJ KUMAR awardedOthers

About MANOJ KUMAR SAW

MANOJ KUMAR SAW appears as a bidder on 58 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 57 decided bids, it was awarded 16 — a 28.1% win rate — worth ₹8.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 4 May 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is NTPC Limited, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 7.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Chand Collection, MAA LAKSHMI ENTERPRISES and RIGHT WAY COMMERCE PRIVATE LIMITED. Chand Collection bid on 32 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; MANOJ KUMAR SAW won 7.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.