Competitor profile

Amrit saw

They win 21% of what they bid, but only 10% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

24tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
29 Dec 2023last award
Total bids
24
24 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
19 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹89.9 L
of ₹9.0 Cr bid — 9.9% conversion
Win rate
20.8%
of 24 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count24 bids
20.8%
79.2%
Awarded520.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost1979.2%
By value₹9.0 Cr
90.1%
Awarded₹89.9 L9.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹8.1 Cr90.1%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

NTPC Limited₹89.9 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

5 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Chand Collection1 win · 16 shared tenders
₹14.9 L
won head-to-head
02
MAA LAKSHMI ENTERPRISES2 wins · 15 shared tenders
₹59.0 L
won head-to-head
03
MANOJ KUMAR SAW0 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/S FAROOQUI ENTERPRISES2 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹52.5 L
won head-to-head
05
joy developments1 win · 8 shared tenders
₹1.5 Cr
won head-to-head
06
SANJAY KUMAR1 win · 6 shared tenders
₹45.4 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAmrit saw awardedOthers

About Amrit saw

Amrit saw appears as a bidder on 24 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 24 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 20.8% win rate — worth ₹89.9 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 29 Dec 2023.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is NTPC Limited, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 8.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Chand Collection, MAA LAKSHMI ENTERPRISES and MANOJ KUMAR SAW. Chand Collection bid on 16 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; Amrit saw won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.