Competitor profile

Tirupati Enterprises

They win 33% of what they bid, and 34% of the value they chase.

24tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
31 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
24
24 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
8
16 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹78.0 L
of ₹2.3 Cr bid — 33.6% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 24 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count24 bids
33.3%
66.7%
Awarded833.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost1666.7%
By value₹2.3 Cr
33.6%
66.4%
Awarded₹78.0 L33.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹1.5 Cr66.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹78.0 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/s S. P. Construction0 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Mr. Ram Amol Kant2 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹30.3 L
won head-to-head
03
RANJEET CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/s Shailesh Bisan Lokhande1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹17.4 L
won head-to-head
05
Bhole Construction1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹14.3 L
won head-to-head
06
M/S FOUR K. ENTERPRISES0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedTirupati Enterprises awardedOthers

About Tirupati Enterprises

Tirupati Enterprises appears as a bidder on 24 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 24 decided bids, it was awarded 8 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹78.0 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 31 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Nagpur Municipal Corporation Nagpur, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 5.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/s S. P. Construction, Mr. Ram Amol Kant and RANJEET CONSTRUCTION. M/s S. P. Construction bid on 9 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; Tirupati Enterprises won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.