Competitor profile

Mr. Ram Amol Kant

They win 14% of what they bid, and 10% of the value they chase.

44tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
17 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
44
44 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
6
35 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.0 Cr
of ₹10.1 Cr bid — 10.4% conversion
Win rate
13.6%
of 44 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count44 bids
13.6%
79.5%
Awarded613.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected36.8%
Lost3579.5%
By value₹10.1 Cr
10.4%
19.4%
70.2%
Awarded₹1.0 Cr10.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.0 Cr19.4%
Lost₹7.1 Cr70.2%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹1.0 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
HIMANSHU CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
GAURI INFOTECH0 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
MOHD FURQUAN RIZWI1 win · 9 shared tenders
₹13.0 L
won head-to-head
04
HITESH CONSTRUCTION2 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹95.4 L
won head-to-head
05
M/S FOUR K. ENTERPRISES0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
P AND D ENTPERPRISES1 win · 7 shared tenders
₹25.4 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMr. Ram Amol awardedOthers

About Mr. Ram Amol Kant

Mr. Ram Amol Kant appears as a bidder on 44 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 44 decided bids, it was awarded 6 — a 13.6% win rate — worth ₹1.0 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 17 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Nagpur Municipal Corporation Nagpur, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 5.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against HIMANSHU CONSTRUCTION, GAURI INFOTECH and MOHD FURQUAN RIZWI. HIMANSHU CONSTRUCTION bid on 9 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; Mr. Ram Amol Kant won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.