Competitor profile

TIRUPATI ENTERPRISE

They win 21% of what they bid, and 30% of the value they chase.

33tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
22 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
33
33 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
7
25 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹77.4 L
of ₹2.6 Cr bid — 29.6% conversion
Win rate
21.2%
of 33 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count33 bids
21.2%
75.8%
Awarded721.2%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected13.0%
Lost2575.8%
By value₹2.6 Cr
29.6%
66.7%
Awarded₹77.4 L29.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹9.5 L3.6%
Lost₹1.7 Cr66.7%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Zilla Parishad₹5.0 L6.5%

Operating states

LowHigh
West Bengal₹77.4 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M M S ENTERPRISE3 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹14.4 L
won head-to-head
02
M/S NEW KALIMATA HARDWARE2 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹4.6 L
won head-to-head
03
B. M. CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
TAPAN ELECTRICS3 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹19.1 L
won head-to-head
05
SOUMEN ENTERPRISE2 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹9.6 L
won head-to-head
06
DEBASHIS MAITI0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedTIRUPATI ENTERPRISE awardedOthers

About TIRUPATI ENTERPRISE

TIRUPATI ENTERPRISE appears as a bidder on 33 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 33 decided bids, it was awarded 7 — a 21.2% win rate — worth ₹77.4 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 22 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, at 64.9% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from West Bengal. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M M S ENTERPRISE, M/S NEW KALIMATA HARDWARE and B. M. CONSTRUCTION. M M S ENTERPRISE bid on 12 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; TIRUPATI ENTERPRISE won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.