Competitor profile

TAGE LAPUNG-T.L. Construction

They win 50% of what they bid — and 77% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

2tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
25 Oct 2013last award
Total bids
2
2 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹9.5 Cr
of ₹12.3 Cr bid — 77.1% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 2 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count2 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded150.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected150.0%
Lost00.0%
By value₹12.3 Cr
77.1%
22.9%
Awarded₹9.5 Cr77.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.8 Cr22.9%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

CE-RD-AR₹9.5 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
sushil agarwalla0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
TALO PATUM-M/S. Reempu Construction0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
MAITUNG TIKHAK1 win · 1 shared tender
₹2.8 Cr
won head-to-head
04
Avinash Bhartia-Bhartia Infra Projects Ltd0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
gemar lollen0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Teli Neni-Nigla Infrastructure @ Power Projects0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedTAGE LAPUNG-T.L. awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to TAGE LAPUNG-T.L.

About TAGE LAPUNG-T.L. Construction

TAGE LAPUNG-T.L. Construction appears as a bidder on 2 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 2 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹9.5 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 25 Oct 2013.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is CE-RD-AR, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against sushil agarwalla, TALO PATUM-M/S. Reempu Construction and MAITUNG TIKHAK. sushil agarwalla bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; TAGE LAPUNG-T.L. Construction won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.