Competitor profile

TALO PATUM-M/S. Reempu Construction

They win 25% of what they bid, and 22% of the value they chase.

4tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
8 Oct 2013last award
Total bids
4
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.3 Cr
of ₹10.4 Cr bid — 22.5% conversion
Win rate
25.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count4 bids
25.0%
75.0%
Awarded125.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected375.0%
Lost00.0%
By value₹10.4 Cr
22.5%
77.5%
Awarded₹2.3 Cr22.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹8.1 Cr77.5%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

CE-RD-AR₹2.3 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
sushil agarwalla0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
gemar lollen0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Kishore Das-G.D. Construction0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
MAITUNG TIKHAK1 win · 1 shared tender
₹2.8 Cr
won head-to-head
06
Kaushik Das-R.D. Trading1 win · 1 shared tender
₹1.8 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedTALO PATUM-M/S. awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to TALO PATUM-M/S.

About TALO PATUM-M/S. Reempu Construction

TALO PATUM-M/S. Reempu Construction appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 25.0% win rate — worth ₹2.3 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 8 Oct 2013.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is CE-RD-AR, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against sushil agarwalla, gemar lollen and Techi Nikum Tara-Ms North East Engineering Construction Agency. sushil agarwalla bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; TALO PATUM-M/S. Reempu Construction won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.