Competitor profile

sushil agarwalla

They win 14% of what they bid, and 10% of the value they chase.

7tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
13 Sept 2014last award
Total bids
7
7 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.0 Cr
of ₹28.3 Cr bid — 10.4% conversion
Win rate
14.3%
of 7 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count7 bids
14.3%
42.9%
42.9%
Awarded114.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected342.9%
Lost342.9%
By value₹28.3 Cr
10.4%
30.5%
59.1%
Awarded₹3.0 Cr10.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹8.6 Cr30.5%
Lost₹16.7 Cr59.1%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

CE-RD-AR₹3.0 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
gemar lollen0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
TALO PATUM-M/S. Reempu Construction1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹2.3 Cr
won head-to-head
03
TAGE LAPUNG-T.L. Construction1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹9.5 Cr
won head-to-head
04
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Yompi Kri-OM TRADERS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
TOI ROMIN-T J ENTERPRISE0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedsushil agarwalla awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to sushil agarwalla

About sushil agarwalla

sushil agarwalla appears as a bidder on 7 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 7 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 14.3% win rate — worth ₹3.0 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 13 Sept 2014.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is CE-RD-AR, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against gemar lollen, TALO PATUM-M/S. Reempu Construction and TAGE LAPUNG-T.L. Construction. gemar lollen bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; sushil agarwalla won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.