Competitor profile

Systematic Communication Pvt Ltd

They win 43% of what they bid, but only 10% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

21tenders on record
3buyer authorities
0states
14 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
21
21 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
9
7 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.6 Cr
of ₹16.2 Cr bid — 10.1% conversion
Win rate
42.9%
of 21 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count21 bids
42.9%
23.8%
33.3%
Awarded942.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected523.8%
Lost733.3%
By value₹16.2 Cr
10.1%
32.5%
57.4%
Awarded₹1.6 Cr10.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹5.3 Cr32.5%
Lost₹9.3 Cr57.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

9 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Sai Communication1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹6.2 L
won head-to-head
02
BHAVA ENGINEERS0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
M/s HARIOM ENTERPRISES0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
PUNDER CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹32.9 L
won head-to-head
05
SYSTEMS ASSOCIATE1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹1.8 Cr
won head-to-head
06
Uptel India0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSystematic awardedOthers

About Systematic Communication Pvt Ltd

Systematic Communication Pvt Ltd appears as a bidder on 21 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 21 decided bids, it was awarded 9 — a 42.9% win rate — worth ₹1.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 14 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Defence Research and Development Organisation, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Sai Communication, BHAVA ENGINEERS and M/s HARIOM ENTERPRISES. Sai Communication bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; Systematic Communication Pvt Ltd won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.