Competitor profile

SUTAPA CONSTRUCTION

They win 31% of what they bid — and 47% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

55tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
7 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
55
55 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
17
38 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹36.3 L
of ₹77.1 L bid — 47.1% conversion
Win rate
30.9%
of 55 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count55 bids
30.9%
69.1%
Awarded1730.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost3869.1%
By value₹77.1 L
47.1%
52.9%
Awarded₹36.3 L47.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹40.8 L52.9%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Zilla Parishad₹36.3 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
West Bengal₹36.3 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
MAA KALI CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 36 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
PRINCE CONSTRUCTION1 win · 23 shared tenders
₹19.7 L
won head-to-head
03
MANASHI CONSTRUCTION14 wins · 14 shared tenders
₹11.6 L
won head-to-head
04
DEBANJANA ENTERPRISE4 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹22.7 L
won head-to-head
05
TARA MA ENTERPRISE5 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹4.9 L
won head-to-head
06
PRATIMA UDDYOG5 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹2.7 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSUTAPA CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

About SUTAPA CONSTRUCTION

SUTAPA CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 55 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 55 decided bids, it was awarded 17 — a 30.9% win rate — worth ₹36.3 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 7 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Zilla Parishad, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from West Bengal. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against MAA KALI CONSTRUCTION, PRINCE CONSTRUCTION and MANASHI CONSTRUCTION. MAA KALI CONSTRUCTION bid on 36 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; SUTAPA CONSTRUCTION won 16.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.