Competitor profile

PRATIMA UDDYOG

They win 83% of what they bid, but only 58% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

6tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
10 Mar 2026last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.7 L
of ₹4.8 L bid — 57.6% conversion
Win rate
83.3%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count6 bids
83.3%
16.7%
Awarded583.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost116.7%
By value₹4.8 L
57.6%
42.4%
Awarded₹2.7 L57.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹2.0 L42.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Zilla Parishad₹2.7 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
West Bengal₹2.7 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
PRINCE CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
SUTAPA CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
R. M. CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
MANASHI CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
RAJOBALA ENTERPRISE0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
NARAYAN TUNGA0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedPRATIMA UDDYOG awardedOthers

About PRATIMA UDDYOG

PRATIMA UDDYOG appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 83.3% win rate — worth ₹2.7 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 10 Mar 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Zilla Parishad, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from West Bengal. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against PRINCE CONSTRUCTION, SUTAPA CONSTRUCTION and R. M. CONSTRUCTION. PRINCE CONSTRUCTION bid on 6 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; PRATIMA UDDYOG won 5.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.