Competitor profile

SULTAN TRADERS

They win 6% of what they bid, and 7% of the value they chase.

18tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
30 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
18
18 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
17 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹4.2 L
of ₹60.4 L bid — 6.9% conversion
Win rate
5.6%
of 18 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count18 bids
94.4%
Awarded15.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost1794.4%
By value₹60.4 L
93.1%
Awarded₹4.2 L6.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹56.3 L93.1%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
West Bengal₹4.2 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
DEEPJOT ENTERPRISE4 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹7.1 L
won head-to-head
02
Hindustan Enterprise3 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹13.8 L
won head-to-head
03
A K ENTERPRISE0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
MONDAL TRADERS3 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹9.9 L
won head-to-head
05
SK JAKIR HOSSAIN0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
SAHA UDYOG1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹2.6 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSULTAN TRADERS awardedOthers

About SULTAN TRADERS

SULTAN TRADERS appears as a bidder on 18 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 18 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 5.6% win rate — worth ₹4.2 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 30 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is MUNICIPAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from West Bengal. On priced bids, its median quote is 5.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against DEEPJOT ENTERPRISE, Hindustan Enterprise and A K ENTERPRISE. DEEPJOT ENTERPRISE bid on 6 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; SULTAN TRADERS won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.