Competitor profile

M/s Shree Saibaba Construction

They win 3% of what they bid, and 9% of the value they chase.

29tenders on record
5buyer authorities
1state
16 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
29
29 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
21 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.5 Cr
of ₹16.7 Cr bid — 9.1% conversion
Win rate
3.5%
of 29 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count29 bids
24.1%
72.4%
Awarded13.4%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected724.1%
Lost2172.4%
By value₹16.7 Cr
14.6%
76.4%
Awarded₹1.5 Cr9.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.4 Cr14.6%
Lost₹12.7 Cr76.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Public Works Region₹1.5 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹1.5 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Sukalp Construction Co.2 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹55.1 L
won head-to-head
02
SHREE SAI ENTERPRISES3 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹1.1 Cr
won head-to-head
03
K.K.Construction0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
AMOGH BAWANKULE0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
ARJUN KATWALE1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹22.7 L
won head-to-head
06
M/s Swami Samarth Construction0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedShree Saibaba awardedOthers

About M/s Shree Saibaba Construction

M/s Shree Saibaba Construction appears as a bidder on 29 government tenders on record, from 5 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 29 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 3.5% win rate — worth ₹1.5 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 16 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Public Works Region, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 23.7% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Sukalp Construction Co., SHREE SAI ENTERPRISES and K.K.Construction. Sukalp Construction Co. bid on 9 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; M/s Shree Saibaba Construction won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.