Competitor profile

M/s Swami Samarth Construction

They win 7% of what they bid — and 28% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

29tenders on record
7buyer authorities
1state
23 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
28
29 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
23 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹4.3 Cr
of ₹15.2 Cr bid — 28.4% conversion
Win rate
7.1%
of 28 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count28 bids
10.7%
82.1%
Awarded27.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected310.7%
Lost2382.1%
By value₹15.2 Cr
28.5%
64.6%
Awarded₹4.3 Cr28.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.1 Cr6.9%
Lost₹9.8 Cr64.6%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹4.3 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SHREE SAI ENTERPRISES3 wins · 14 shared tenders
₹76.9 L
won head-to-head
02
Sukalp Construction Co.1 win · 6 shared tenders
₹26.4 L
won head-to-head
03
priyaconstruction0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/S. NANAK CONSTRUCTIONS0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Ms Shriyan Construction, Nagpur0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
RRPG INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSwami Samarth awardedOthers

About M/s Swami Samarth Construction

M/s Swami Samarth Construction appears as a bidder on 29 government tenders on record, from 7 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 28 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 7.1% win rate — worth ₹4.3 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 23 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Nagpur Municipal Corporation Nagpur, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 6.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SHREE SAI ENTERPRISES, Sukalp Construction Co. and priyaconstruction. SHREE SAI ENTERPRISES bid on 14 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; M/s Swami Samarth Construction won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.