Competitor profile

Sapna Associates

They win 39% of what they bid, and 45% of the value they chase.

18tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
3 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
18
18 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
7
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹16.0 Cr
of ₹35.8 Cr bid — 44.7% conversion
Win rate
38.9%
of 18 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count18 bids
38.9%
38.9%
22.2%
Awarded738.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected738.9%
Lost422.2%
By value₹35.8 Cr
44.7%
28.2%
27.1%
Awarded₹16.0 Cr44.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹10.1 Cr28.2%
Lost₹9.7 Cr27.1%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttar Pradesh₹16.0 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M.S. Construction4 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹9.7 Cr
won head-to-head
02
M/s B.N. GOEL AND COMPANY2 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹1.2 Cr
won head-to-head
03
M/S SHISHU PRATAP SINGH CONTRACTOR1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹5.4 Cr
won head-to-head
04
SHRI KRISHNA ASSOCIATES0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
prabhat associates0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
SHRI BANKEY BIHARI TRADER3 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹35.1 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSapna Associates awardedOthers

About Sapna Associates

Sapna Associates appears as a bidder on 18 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 18 decided bids, it was awarded 7 — a 38.9% win rate — worth ₹16.0 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 3 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Uttar Pradesh Rajya Nirman Sahkari Sangh Limited, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Uttar Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against M.S. Construction, M/s B.N. GOEL AND COMPANY and M/S SHISHU PRATAP SINGH CONTRACTOR. M.S. Construction bid on 10 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; Sapna Associates won 6.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.