Competitor profile

M.S. Construction

They win 36% of what they bid, and 32% of the value they chase.

14tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
22 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
14
14 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
5 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹9.8 Cr
of ₹30.2 Cr bid — 32.5% conversion
Win rate
35.7%
of 14 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count14 bids
35.7%
28.6%
35.7%
Awarded535.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected428.6%
Lost535.7%
By value₹30.2 Cr
32.5%
50.7%
16.8%
Awarded₹9.8 Cr32.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹15.3 Cr50.7%
Lost₹5.1 Cr16.8%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttar Pradesh₹9.8 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Sapna Associates6 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹10.5 Cr
won head-to-head
02
M/s B.N. GOEL AND COMPANY0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
prabhat associates2 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹9.3 Cr
won head-to-head
04
M/S SHISHU PRATAP SINGH CONTRACTOR0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/s M S Horticulturist And Consultant0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/S MITTAL CONSTRUCTION CO.0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedM.S. Construction awardedOthers

About M.S. Construction

M.S. Construction appears as a bidder on 14 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 14 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 35.7% win rate — worth ₹9.8 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 22 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Uttar Pradesh Rajya Nirman Sahkari Sangh Limited, at 98.7% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Uttar Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Sapna Associates, M/s B.N. GOEL AND COMPANY and prabhat associates. Sapna Associates bid on 10 of the same tenders and won 6 of them; M.S. Construction won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.