Competitor profile

richloom fabrics

They win 4% of what they bid, and 3% of the value they chase.

31tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
28 Sept 2023last award
Total bids
25
31 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
24 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.6 Cr
of ₹61.9 Cr bid — 2.7% conversion
Win rate
4.0%
of 25 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count25 bids
96.0%
Awarded14.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost2496.0%
By value₹61.9 Cr
97.3%
Awarded₹1.6 Cr2.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹60.3 Cr97.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Department of Water Resources₹1.6 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Punjab₹1.6 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
GUPTA SHIVAM DYEING PROCESSORS1 win · 31 shared tenders
₹2.0 Cr
won head-to-head
02
MAAN INDUSTRIES0 wins · 29 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
GURINDER SINGH BHATTI1 win · 29 shared tenders
₹2.3 Cr
won head-to-head
04
M/S KULDEEP SINGH & BROS2 wins · 28 shared tenders
₹4.4 Cr
won head-to-head
05
GARG SONS ESTATE PROMOTORS PVT.LTD.1 win · 28 shared tenders
₹1.5 Cr
won head-to-head
06
ROSHAN SINGH & SONS0 wins · 27 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedrichloom fabrics awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to richloom fabrics

About richloom fabrics

richloom fabrics appears as a bidder on 31 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 25 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 4.0% win rate — worth ₹1.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 28 Sept 2023.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Department of Water Resources, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Punjab. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against GUPTA SHIVAM DYEING PROCESSORS, MAAN INDUSTRIES and GURINDER SINGH BHATTI. GUPTA SHIVAM DYEING PROCESSORS bid on 31 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; richloom fabrics won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.