Competitor profile

MAAN INDUSTRIES

They win 8% of what they bid, and 9% of the value they chase.

33tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
22 May 2025last award
Total bids
26
33 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
24 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹5.4 Cr
of ₹62.4 Cr bid — 8.7% conversion
Win rate
7.7%
of 26 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count26 bids
92.3%
Awarded27.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost2492.3%
By value₹62.4 Cr
91.3%
Awarded₹5.4 Cr8.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹57.0 Cr91.3%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Punjab₹5.4 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
richloom fabrics1 win · 29 shared tenders
₹1.6 Cr
won head-to-head
02
GUPTA SHIVAM DYEING PROCESSORS1 win · 29 shared tenders
₹2.0 Cr
won head-to-head
03
GURINDER SINGH BHATTI0 wins · 29 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
GARG SONS ESTATE PROMOTORS PVT.LTD.1 win · 29 shared tenders
₹1.5 Cr
won head-to-head
05
M/S KULDEEP SINGH & BROS2 wins · 28 shared tenders
₹4.4 Cr
won head-to-head
06
ROSHAN SINGH & SONS0 wins · 28 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMAAN INDUSTRIES awardedOthers

About MAAN INDUSTRIES

MAAN INDUSTRIES appears as a bidder on 33 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 26 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 7.7% win rate — worth ₹5.4 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 22 May 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Department of Water Resources, at 100.0% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Punjab. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against richloom fabrics, GUPTA SHIVAM DYEING PROCESSORS and GURINDER SINGH BHATTI. richloom fabrics bid on 29 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; MAAN INDUSTRIES won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.