Competitor profile

Ramvati Contractor

They win 29% of what they bid, but only 13% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

17tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
14 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
17
17 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
9 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹31.5 L
of ₹2.5 Cr bid — 12.6% conversion
Win rate
29.4%
of 17 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count17 bids
29.4%
17.6%
52.9%
Awarded529.4%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected317.6%
Lost952.9%
By value₹2.5 Cr
12.6%
63.9%
23.6%
Awarded₹31.5 L12.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.6 Cr63.9%
Lost₹59.0 L23.6%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttar Pradesh₹31.5 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/s Bagesh And Sons8 wins · 13 shared tenders
₹1.9 Cr
won head-to-head
02
RAJENDRA KUMAR4 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹28.6 L
won head-to-head
03
Ismaile Khan Contractor0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
SARTHAK CONTRACTOR0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/S JAI BHOLEY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedRamvati Contractor awardedOthers

About Ramvati Contractor

Ramvati Contractor appears as a bidder on 17 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 17 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 29.4% win rate — worth ₹31.5 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 14 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is U.P. State Construction and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd., at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Uttar Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/s Bagesh And Sons, RAJENDRA KUMAR and Ismaile Khan Contractor. M/s Bagesh And Sons bid on 13 of the same tenders and won 8 of them; Ramvati Contractor won 5.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.