Competitor profile

M/s Bagesh And Sons

They win 34% of what they bid — and 49% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

32tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
2 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
29
32 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
10
18 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.4 Cr
of ₹7.0 Cr bid — 48.8% conversion
Win rate
34.5%
of 29 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count29 bids
34.5%
62.1%
Awarded1034.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected13.4%
Lost1862.1%
By value₹7.0 Cr
48.8%
44.7%
Awarded₹3.4 Cr48.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹46.0 L6.6%
Lost₹3.1 Cr44.7%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttar Pradesh₹3.4 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Ramvati Contractor5 wins · 13 shared tenders
₹31.5 L
won head-to-head
02
Ismaile Khan Contractor6 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹27.2 L
won head-to-head
03
NAZEER AHMAD CONTRACTOR0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
NARENDRA GANGWAR CONTRACTOR3 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹54.0 L
won head-to-head
05
Indrajeet Verma1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹1.5 Cr
won head-to-head
06
Abdul Hameed0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedBagesh And awardedOthers

About M/s Bagesh And Sons

M/s Bagesh And Sons appears as a bidder on 32 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 29 decided bids, it was awarded 10 — a 34.5% win rate — worth ₹3.4 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 2 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is U.P. State Construction and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd., at 59.9% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Uttar Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Ramvati Contractor, Ismaile Khan Contractor and NAZEER AHMAD CONTRACTOR. Ramvati Contractor bid on 13 of the same tenders and won 5 of them; M/s Bagesh And Sons won 8.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.